Skip to content

如何用 ChatGPT 帮助你准备 EB1A 申请

  1. 请购买 ChatGPT Plus，使用 GPT-4 model 。
  2. ChatGPT 的效果很大程度决定于设定的 prompt。怎样写好 prompt 参考阅读：ChatGPT Prompt 编写指南 （https://jerryzou.com/posts/how-to-write-a-prompt-for-chatgpt/）

使用范例

  1. 精准提问：提供准确的移民局 EB1A 要求，并询问 ChatGPT 如何满足这些要求。例如，可以直接粘贴某个移民局官网的具体的要求，然后询问如何满足它。
  2. 多次迭代：与 ChatGPT 进行多次互动，尝试不同的提问方式。例如："为什么我在 XXX 领域的工作具有实质性意义和国家重要性？" 或 "为什么美国对推动 XXX 领域的研究感兴趣？"
  3. 段落扩充和编辑：可以将草稿段落输入到 ChatGPT 中，并要求其扩展和编辑，使其更具逻辑性并加强证据支持某一点。
  4. 多段落组织：有多个段落内容时，可以要求 ChatGPT 协助编辑内容，增强逻辑连贯性并强化支持多个要点的证据。
  5. 职业推荐信协助：ChatGPT 可以帮助基于经历撰写专业而简洁的推荐信，并根据不同的信件调整语气。
  6. 文献引用列表：如果有其他论文引用了文章，可以要求 ChatGPT 创建一个表格，列出这些文章，并包括相关的列，如期刊名称、年份、作者名称、作者头衔和大学等。
  7. 内容总结：ChatGPT 可以为您阅读网页、PDF 文件，并总结内容。有时 ChatGPT 可能会产生幻觉，所以仍然需要仔细核对。

Prompt 例子

写重大贡献部分：

  • My name is 名字. I am drafting an EB1A petition letter for my green card application in the US. I claimed I am an alien of extraordinary ability in the sciences, especially in the field of 领域. I will provide you with the draft and you will provide the polished or rewritten version. The letter must be easily understood by the immigration officer since he does not have any academic background. the content should focus on concrete examples with details such as the importance of your work, how it is being used, what your specific contributions to the collaborative research are, what impact your work has made or is expected to make etc. Here are the criteria to highlight my original contributions of major significance in my field："When discussing the beneficiary's contributions, provide specific examples of how their work has introduced new concepts, methods, or tools that have not been previously explored or utilized in their field. This will demonstrate the "original" aspect of their work. Highlight the unique approach, methodology, or insights that the beneficiary has brought to their research, making sure to explain how these elements distinguish their work from previous studies or existing knowledge in their field. To emphasize the "major" significance of the beneficiary's work, describe the impact their contributions have had on their field, such as the advancement of scientific knowledge, the discovery of new therapeutic targets, or the development of novel technologies. Explain how the beneficiary's work has influenced or inspired other researchers in their field, resulting in collaborations, follow-up studies, or the adoption of their methods by other investigators. Provide quantitative evidence, where possible, to support the "major" significance of the beneficiary's contributions, such as the number of citations their work has received, the successful application of their methods in clinical trials, or the financial investments made in further developing their discoveries." reply "OK" if you understand it.

将审核标准同样输入到 prompt 中：

  • Officers must evaluate whether the original work constitutes major, significant contributions to the field. Although funded and published work may be "original," this fact alone is not sufficient to establish that the work is of major significance. For example, peer-reviewed presentations at academic symposia or peer-reviewed articles in scholarly journals that have provoked widespread commentary or received notice from others working in the field, or entries (particularly a goodly number) in a citation index that cite the person's work as authoritative in the field, may be probative of the significance of the person's contributions to the field of endeavor. Officers should take into account the probative analysis that experts in the field may provide in opinion letters regarding the significance of the person's contributions in order to assist in giving an assessment of the person's original contributions of major significance. That said, not all expert letters provide such analysis. Letters that specifically articulate how the person's contributions are of major significance to the field and their impact on subsequent work add value. Letters that lack specifics and simply use hyperbolic language do not add value and are not considered to be probative evidence that may form the basis for meeting this criterion.

写 Notable citation:

  • Can you rephrase this paragraph to fit this example logic: "I once cited Mr. XX's article X, where he conducted XX work, which was enlightening to my research. Drawing upon this inspiration, I was able to publish my paper in X. Based on this, I wrote a recommendation letter for him, in accordance with the requirements for EB1A.". here is the draft: "

1.

如何用 ChatGPT 写独立推荐信

下面是我用的 prompt，记住要根据你找的推荐人来改你的 prompt 所写的方向：

  1. My name is XXX. I want you to act as a professor to polish the independent recommendation letter for my EB1A application. The tone should be more plain language. Please only focus on the part about the Original contribution of major significance. The letter should explain why they hold such an assessment. The letters should focus on concrete examples with details such as the importance of my work, how it is being used, what my specific contributions to the collaborative research are, what impact my work has made or is expected to make etc. Letters and testimonies must provide as much detail as possible about the beneficiary's contribution and must explain, in detail, how the contribution was "original" (not merely replicating the work of others) and how they were of "major" significance. general statements regarding the importance of the endeavors which are not supported by documentary evidence are insufficient. Remember one key point：recommendation letters are merely pointers to the evidence. The content of the recommendation letter itself has little persuasive power if it is not backed by pre-existing actual documents as evidence. These pre-existing actual documents refer to notable citations, adaptations, and examples of critical assessments. Here is a example of the logic：What was done, what was discovered, and the significant impact the achievements had, for example, how article X cited my work; article X praised my work, which led to their publication in journal X. Your letter should cover three aspects, (1) My research has made significant advancements in the xxx (2) My research has greatly enhanced the comprehension of xxx to the field (3) My research has xxxx. Reply 'OK' if you understand and then I will provide my draft and please polish, rewrite, or extend if necessary.

写完一版后，让 ChatGPT 基于假如收到 RFE 后提出修改建议：

  1. åWhat suggestions do you have for the following comments "While the evidence shows that you have made original contributions to his field. the evidence does not sufficiently demonstrate that his contribution are of major significance within the field as a whole. Your research is no double of value, but it can be argued that any research must be shown to be original and present some benefit if it is to receive funding and attention from the scientific community. any research in order to be accepted for publication must offer new useful information to the pool of knowledge. it does not follow that every researcher who performs original research that adds to the general pool of knowledge has inherently made a contribution of major significance to the field as a whole." based our previous paragraphs. do not respond to the comments, just provide suggestions to how to better address the concerns.